Universal purification with classically simulable operations
- Fields
- Topics
Problem
Can classically simulable operations purify an unknown depolarized pure state from any number of copies? Fix a dimension \(d\) that is either \(2\) or odd. For an unknown pure state \(\psi=|\psi\rangle\langle\psi|\) on \(\mathbb C^d\) and a noise parameter \(0<\delta<1\), consider the depolarized copy
Let \(\mathcal A_2\) be the set of completely stabilizer-preserving maps on qubits and, for odd \(d\), let \(\mathcal A_d\) be the set of completely positive-Wigner-preserving maps on qudits; both classes are efficiently classically simulable, and trace-nonincreasing (probabilistic) members are allowed. For \(n\geq2\) copies and a success probability \(0<s\leq1\), the optimal Haar-averaged purification fidelity is
where \(\mathcal E\) maps the \(n\) copies to one \(d\)-dimensional system and \(d\psi\) is the Haar measure on pure states. Is
for every \(n\geq2\), every \(0<\delta<1\), and every \(0<s\leq1\), so that no classically simulable protocol, deterministic or postselected, improves on the single-copy fidelity in Eq. (1)?
Source
He, Zhu, Yao, Liu, Li, and Wang prove Eq. (3) for two copies and explicitly conjecture that universal purification is impossible without non-stabilizer resources for every dimension and every number of copies [HZY+26].
Progress
For two copies the no-go statement is a theorem: for qubits under completely stabilizer-preserving maps and for every odd \(d\) under completely positive-Wigner-preserving maps, \(F^{\mathcal A_d}_{\delta}(2,s)=1-\frac{d-1}{d}\delta\) for every \(0<s\leq1\), so neither deterministic nor postselected classically simulable processing improves the Haar-averaged fidelity [HZY+26].
Semidefinite programs return the same value, and hence no improvement, for
\begin{equation} (d,n)\in\{(2,3),(2,4),(3,3),(3,4)\}, \tag{4} \end{equation}but the finite cases in Eq. (4) do not prove the statement for all \(n\) and all admissible \(d\) [HZY+26].
Without the restriction to classically simulable maps, projecting the \(n\) copies of a depolarized qubit onto their symmetric subspace is the optimal universal purifier and raises the fidelity above the single-copy value. A proof of Eq. (3) would therefore isolate dynamical non-stabilizer resources as necessary for purification rather than establish an unrestricted impossibility [CEM99].
Comment
Only the two-copy case is proved. The three- and four-copy evidence is numerical and cannot exclude a genuinely many-copy classically simulable protocol, and the completely positive-Wigner-preserving class in Eq. (2) is defined only for odd \(d\), so even dimensions above two are outside the present formulation.