All-code exponential strong converse for degradable channels
- Field
- Topics
Problem
Does every finite-dimensional degradable quantum channel satisfy an all-code exponential strong converse for quantum communication at its quantum capacity? Let \(V:A\to B\otimes E\) be a Stinespring isometry, and define the channel and one complementary channel by
The channel in Eq. (1) is degradable when there is a completely positive trace-preserving map \(\mathcal D:\mathcal L(B)\to\mathcal L(E)\) such that
For a channel satisfying Eq. (2), its quantum capacity is the single-letter coherent information
For an arbitrary \(n\)-use entanglement-transmission code, let the encoder and decoder be CPTP maps \(\mathcal E_n:\mathcal L(S_n)\to\mathcal L(A^{\otimes n})\) and \(\mathcal R_n:\mathcal L(B^{\otimes n})\to\mathcal L(\widehat S_n)\), with \(\dim S_n=\dim\widehat S_n=M_n\). If \(\Phi_{M_n}^{R_nS_n}\) is maximally entangled, define the code rate and entanglement fidelity by
The all-code exponential strong converse asks whether, for every \(R>Q(\mathcal N)\), there are constants \(\gamma_R>0\) and \(n_R\) such that every code in Eq. (4) obeys
Equation (5) requires a bound for every encoder–decoder pair, rather than for almost every member of a random code ensemble.
Source
Morgan and Winter explicitly isolated the upgrade from their pretty-strong converse to a full strong converse for degradable channels [MW14]. Wilde records this gap, together with the corresponding all-code gap for the quantum erasure channel, in Section 24.10 of his text [Wil17].
Progress
Morgan and Winter proved that rates above Eq. (3) force the asymptotic fidelity to be bounded away from one for every degradable channel. Their “pretty strong” converse did not force \(F_n\) to zero and therefore did not imply Eq. (5) [MW14].
Wilde and Winter proved exponential fidelity decay above the quantum capacity of the erasure channel for almost all codes drawn from their random ensemble. The exceptional set was not excluded, so their theorem was not the all-code statement in Eq. (5) [WW14].
Kondra, Brinster, Kampermann, Bruß, and Wyderka prove Eq. (5) for every finite-dimensional degradable channel and also prove an exponential strong converse for every finite-dimensional antidegradable channel. Since every quantum erasure channel is degradable or antidegradable, their result gives the first all-code exponential strong converse for the erasure channel over its full parameter range [KBK+26].
Comment
The solved status records the theorem claimed in [KBK+26]. As of 2026-09-02, that work was a one-month-old, unrefereed v1 preprint, so the closure is provisional and should be re-audited if the preprint changes. Problem asks for an exponential strong converse for the larger, potentially strict class of transpose-degradable channels; the theorem above applies to ordinarily degradable and antidegradable channels and does not by itself settle that extension.
References
- [MW14]
- C. Morgan and A. Winter, “Pretty Strong Converse for the Quantum Capacity of Degradable Channels,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 60, 317–333 (2014).DOIarXiv
- [WW14]
- M. M. Wilde and A. Winter, “Strong Converse for the Quantum Capacity of the Erasure Channel for Almost All Codes,” in 9th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2014), LIPIcs 27, 52–66 (2014).DOIarXiv