Amortization collapse for superchannel divergences
- Fields
- Topics
Problem
Does amortization collapse for the max-relative entropy and geometric Rényi divergence of arbitrary finite-dimensional quantum superchannels? For compatible states, let
with the standard support conventions. For either divergence \(\mathbf D\in\{D_{\max},\widehat D_\alpha\}\), define its channel extension and channel-amortized extension by
In Eq. (2), identity maps on \(R\) are implicit, and the optimizations allow an arbitrary reference of sufficient finite dimension. For superchannels \(\Theta_1,\Theta_2\), set
Is
for both choices of \(\mathbf D\) in Eq. (1) and all superchannel pairs?
Source
Hirche explicitly left Eq. (4) open while deriving strong-converse bounds for adaptive superchannel discrimination [Hir23].
Progress
For point-to-point channels, amortization of the max-relative entropy collapses:
\begin{equation} D_{\max,{\rm ch}}^{A}(\mathcal N\|\mathcal M) =D_{\max,{\rm ch}}(\mathcal N\|\mathcal M). \tag{5} \end{equation}The proof of Eq. (5) uses the CP-order structure of channel max-relative entropy [WBHK20].
Fang and Fawzi proved the analogous point-to-point channel collapse
\begin{equation} \widehat D_{\alpha,{\rm ch}}^{A}(\mathcal N\|\mathcal M) =\widehat D_{\alpha,{\rm ch}}(\mathcal N\|\mathcal M), \qquad 1<\alpha\leq2, \tag{6} \end{equation}from a chain rule for the geometric Rényi divergence [FF21].
Hirche used the amortized quantities in Eq. (3) to bound nested-adaptive superchannel discrimination, and introduced fully amortized variants for arbitrary interleavings of superchannel components. The channel proofs of Eqs. (5) and (6) have not been lifted to these superchannel settings [Hir23].
Comment
Equation (4) concerns the nested-adaptive amortization in Eq. (3). Whether the larger fully amortized divergences controlling braided and fully general strategies collapse is a further, stronger question.