Generalized Stein lemma for fully quantum channel resources
- Fields
- Topics
Problem
Let \(\mathcal N:\mathcal L(A)\to\mathcal L(B)\) be a finite-dimensional quantum channel. For each \(n\), let \(\mathfrak F_n\) be a nonempty compact, convex, permutation-invariant set of channels from \(A^{\otimes n}\) to \(B^{\otimes n}\), closed under tensor products and containing \(\mathcal R_\omega^{\otimes n}\) for one full-rank state \(\omega\), where \(\mathcal R_\omega(X):=\operatorname{Tr}(X)\omega\). Define
where the supremum in Eq. (1) is over density operators and \(D\) is the quantum relative entropy. The distance to the free set is
Equation (2) is the \(n\)-use relative-entropy distance to the free channel set. For \(\varepsilon\in(0,1)\), define the optimal worst-case type-II error of a parallel quantum-input/quantum-output test by
Under what additional structural assumptions on \((\mathfrak F_n)_{n\geq1}\), if any, do both limits exist and obey the fully quantum generalized Stein identity
Source
The fully quantum formulation is implicit in the two generalized Stein theorems for classical-input channels, both of which isolate their classical-input structure from the unresolved quantum-input setting [HY25b], [BDK25].
Progress
For an i.i.d. resource state tested against admissible composite sets of free states, the generalized quantum Stein lemma identifies the fixed-error exponent with the regularized relative entropy of resource [HY25a].
Two independent works prove the channel analogue for classical–quantum channels. In that setting the channel relative entropy reduces to
\begin{equation} D_{\rm CQ}(\Phi\|\Psi)=\max_x D(\rho_x\|\sigma_x), \qquad \Phi:x\mapsto\rho_x,\quad\Psi:x\mapsto\sigma_x, \tag{5} \end{equation}and its pointwise structure supplies the additivity and minimax steps needed for a fixed-error theorem. These steps apply to Eq. (5) but are unavailable in this form for QQ channels [HY25b], [BDK25].
The CQ proof explicitly states that analogous properties for fully quantum channels remain unclear. Entangled quantum inputs introduce a reference system and a nontrivial order between input optimization and the worst-case free-channel optimization in Eq. (3) [HY25b].
Comment
The state theorem and the CQ-channel theorems do not imply Eq. (4) for genuinely quantum inputs. An adaptive quantum-comb version would be a further problem and is not included in the present statement.